The
presentations will be peer-assessed according to the following criteria:
Good
|
Average
|
To be re-done
|
|
Quality of the presentation:
/10
|
Legible, properly spaced, well-structured. Effects (if used)
support the content. Presenters talk to the slides and don’t read the slides.
(8 – 10)
|
Font too small, use of colours makes reading difficult,
dysfunctional fussiness. Presenters seem unsure of content, inaudible. (5 -7)
|
Presentation not ready, structure not clear, group members
disorganised or absent. (0)
|
Quality of the explanation: /10
|
Clear, logical and sufficient: explanation is succinct and covers
the main points. (8 – 10)
|
Explanation unbalanced, partial explanation, misunderstanding/
incorrect elements. (5 - 7)
|
Serious misunderstanding evident. (Below 5)
|
Language use in presentation:
/3
|
Presentation was proofread, no distracting errors. (3)
|
Grammar/ spelling errors distracting. (2)
|
More than 5 grammatical or spelling errors in the presentation.
(1)
|
Quality of exercise: /2
|
Exercise tests the particular grammar point; some fill-in elements
but also contextualised exercises. (2)
|
Fill-in, decontextualized exercise, not addressing the topic. (1)
|
Exercise does not deal with the topic. (0)
|
No comments:
Post a Comment